5 Comments
User's avatar
Shannon Rose's avatar

I think I must attend one of the worst 1969 creations of a "church." It is round and looks, on the outside, to be an ugly dark brown wooden BARN (I've seen beautiful barns, but not this one). The only hint that it is a "church" from the outside is a stark white plain cross erected among some plants. It is hideous- and the inside is not much better. It must have been brutalist-inspired and people have tried to soften it over the years by adding wood paneling and such. It's is a terrible trial, but I have no other choice at the moment... the appearance of a structure for praying really does affect one's attempts at rightful worship. Thank you for reiterating that!

Expand full comment
Hilary White's avatar

Are there "canons" of sacred architecture? I know there are canons of iconography.

Expand full comment
Robert Lazu Kmita's avatar

Yes, there are such "canons" - an extensive presentation of the rules that were followed by the creators of Medieval churches can be found in the monograph written by the French classical studies scholar Jean Hani: Le Symbolisme du temple chrétien (1962: English translation: The Symbolism of the Christian Temple, Angelico Press, 2016). If desired, this work can be the starting point for an extensive investigation. I also recommend the excellent documentary mentioned in the note 1 which also unveils the rules of the sacred architecture.

Expand full comment
Hilary White's avatar

(it's Miss, not Mrs., and Hilary, not Hillary.)

Expand full comment
Robert Lazu Kmita's avatar

Dear Miss Hilary, please, accept my apologies. I have corrected on the channel the two mentioned errors.

Expand full comment