In the context of an ‘ufologist’ forum with many followers, someone started a discussion about my previous articles regarding the non-existence of extraterrestrials. One of the readers, visibly annoyed by the content, accused the text of being a ‘diversion’ meant to distract from the only real issue: proving that the U.S. government is hiding alien spacecrafts and, possibly, organic remains of little green men. What caught my attention was the fact that the claims were made with the conviction of religious belief, rather than with the solidity of rational arguments. That is why I will dedicate a special article to the issue of attitudes toward the UFO matter.
Given the increasingly acute politicization of the issue, through hearings in the U.S. Congress1 and the ‘revelations’ of the Mexican government (which in September 2023 displayed two fossilized mummies claiming they were the bodies of ETs),2 it is necessary to cleanse our minds of such unscrupulous manipulations. This is why I personally believe that every Christian should know the correct answers to a nuanced question: could extraterrestrials exist?
Before responding to such a challenging question, I must clarify what I understand by ‘extraterrestrials.’ Usually, those who discuss such a possibility refer to rational beings, similar to us, living in the same physical universe as our own. So, by ‘extraterrestrials,’ I mean physical beings endowed with bodies—not angels or demons. Of course, I’m not saying that the so-called UFOs could not be ‘preternatural’3 manifestations of angels or demons. Although this hypothesis is also worthy of attention, I will set it aside in this article. What I will discuss here strictly pertains to the possibility of the existence of rational, physically embodied beings somewhere in the cosmos—meaning within the limits of the same physical universe in which we, humans, live.
If that is the case, then the answer to the question raised above—‘could extraterrestrials exist?’—is negative: no, in this physical cosmos, there cannot be other rational beings besides humans. I emphasize that I am strictly referring to non-human beings that we, as humans, could directly know, much like we can know a tribe of natives in Papua New Guinea or the Amazon rainforest. Therefore, such beings cannot exist on other planets within our universe. The rationale for my answer is not empirical or experimental in nature. It derives from certain teachings of the Christian supernatural Revelation, which provides us with knowledge beyond what we can access through our ordinary faculties of understanding.
Concretely, there are two Christian teachings at play. The first relates to what traditional theology, both in the East and the West, calls ‘original sin.’ The second pertains to the notion of ‘monogenesis.’ These provide us with a comprehensive intellectual framework, consisting of two theological axioms that will enable us, through a process of deductive reasoning, to establish an answer to the question at hand. First, I will explain the two above concepts that will supply us with our premises.
The doctrine of original sin, described in the Holy Scripture in the third chapter of Genesis as the consumption of the forbidden fruit by Adam and Eve, represents the act that produced the most terrible imaginable consequences: from being immortal, as they had been in Paradise, humans became mortal. This fact, recognized in various forms by numerous ancient religions, is often termed the ‘fall.’ The difference between the state of humans before the fall, which we can only imagine vaguely, and the state after the fall, which we all directly experience, is immense. Before the fall, humans were not only immortal but also free from disease and aging—in short, free from all the evils of our fallen state of nature. The revealed teaching about original sin has been a constant subject of meditation for all the Saints and Doctors of the Church, a province of theology that was perhaps most thoroughly detailed during the Council of Trent (1545–1563).
This teaching is necessarily associated with that of monogenesis (or monogenism), which asserts that the entire human race descends from a single couple, consisting of a man and a woman, Adam and Eve, created by God at the beginning of history. The fall of these two original beings had as its primary consequence the loss of the grace of original righteousness—that supernatural, divine light which not only adorned them but also endowed them with all the preternatural qualities accompanying the most invaluable gift, immortality. Losing divine grace, they immediately lost both immortality and all the attributes of that privileged existence. In essence, they became just like us—or, at any rate, we have ever since been like them: fragile, prone to illness, entangled in the mud of an earthly existence dominated by death. In a word, the human nature that Adam and Eve originally possessed was not completely destroyed, but severely corrupted. And what they transmitted to their descendants was and is precisely this human nature affected by original sin. This is the primary reason why the authentic Christian Church, of apostolic origin, has always practiced the baptism of children (through which the fallen human nature is cleansed of original sin). Therefore, all human beings originate from the first couple, consisting of the man Adam and the woman Eve, making it easy to understand why their fallen state has been passed on to all their descendants.
But if things are as described, then we can understand why we cannot conceive the existence of extraterrestrials: firstly, because only humans could result from Adam and Eve. However, someone might raise the following objection: how do we know that God did not create other couples besides the one formed by Adam and Eve? Simply put, Divine revelation, contained in the canon of the sacred books of the Bible, clearly states that there was only one couple. Then another question could be posed: why couldn’t God create, on another planet somewhere else in the cosmos, another couple from a different species of rational beings than humans? Theoretically, it is evident that God, being omnipotent, could do such a thing. However, this is excluded concerning our cosmos. Let’s see why.
The fall of Adam and Eve entailed the fall not only of human nature, but also of the nature of all creation. In other words, the whole cosmos suffered and is suffering because of the fall of the first men. This is highlighted by Saint Paul the Apostle, who states that “the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him that made it subject;” consequently, “every creature groaneth and travaileth in pain, even till now” (Romans 8:20-22).
This curse on the earth is interpreted by Saint Macarius the Great as representing creation, which, along with Adam—captured by the devil through original sin—was also unwillingly captured. Saint Maximus the Confessor comments on the swallowing of the prophet Jonah by the sea monster, indicating that, symbolically at least, it represents the swallowing of both human nature and the entire nature of creation by the devil. Saint Augustine shows how, from the ease of immortal life in Paradise, where everything was given to Adam and Eve effortlessly, life transitioned, after original sin, to a life where everything became hard to attain, requiring great effort. That is the deep meaning of God’s words to Adam:
Because thou hast hearkened to the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat, cursed is the earth in thy work; with labour and toil shalt thou eat thereof all the days of thy life (Genesis 3:17).
In other words, the nature of the entire creation underwent a wholesale ontological mutation with the fall of man. That having been said, let’s return to the question of the existence of extraterrestrials. For the sake of argument, let’s assume for a moment that extraterrestrials could exist in our universe. The next question immediately arises: are they affected by the original sin committed by Adam and Eve? The answer can only be negative: because, as the sacred teachings of Christian theology tell us, original sin is transmitted only through direct generation. So, it is strictly limited to the human species.
Alright, but an insistent ufologist might ask something else: what if, on another planet in our universe, God created other rational, non-human beings? In this case, either they did not commit original sin, or they did. The practically null probability that another species of rational beings would commit the same sin as the first humans compels us to exclude this hypothesis. So let’s examine the main claim in our insistent ufologist’s question: might God have created another rational species in a fallen universe, severely damaged—though not directly implicated in—by the sin of the first humans?
This would mean, that besides human beings, God created other rational, mortal creatures—because, as I explained in my short theological-metaphysical argument, in the fallen physical cosmos everything is mortal. According to this argument, those extraterrestrials would also have to be mortal; otherwise, their existence would not be possible in a fallen world subject to the penalty of death incurred by original sin. But wouldn’t this be unjust? Because we see that all creatures created by God at the beginning, as Genesis tells us, were “very good”—and, of course, immortal. Being not only the origin of life but life itself (John 14:6), God cannot include death in the equation of creation for any rational being not guilty of such punishment. Therefore, the possibility of the existence of rational beings, other than humans, created mortals without having committed original sin is excluded.
And yet, if we admit that extraterrestrials cannot exist in our world, then do UFOs exist or not? Yes, it is possible that such ‘unidentified flying objects’ exist. However, testimonies must be treated with a great deal of caution. What could UFOs be? First and foremost, the fruits of self-deception on a large scale. Is such a thing possible? The incredible spread of superstitions in some cultures of other historical epochs, superstitions that today we consider hallucinations, prove that many members of the human family can believe in the strangest and most absurd things.
On the other hand, mass manipulation is no joke. With today’s media, this has become not only plausible but very real. However, there are cases that seem quite real. What do we do with them? Here we can think of another kind of ‘extraterrestrials:’ fallen angels, i.e., demons, who exist in what the Christian creed calls ‘the unseen world.’ With divine permission, they can act in our world. The disturbing book of Job clearly shows us this. Most likely, however, the actions of humans thirsty for wealth, fame, and especially power can offer a much more plausible explanation than the interventions of occult, demonic powers. If we think about how ufological literature was used for anti-religious and materialist propaganda purposes by the Communist Party in Romania, we have the most concrete example of the way political power could operate. Here’s why, in a post-pandemic context like ours, the value of the classical virtue of prudence can never be emphasized enough.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/are-5-memorable-moments-congress-ufo-hearing-rcna96476 [Accessed: 23 August 2024].
Details here: https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/09/13/1000-year-old-fossils-of-alien-corpses-displayed-in-mexicos-congress-as-ufo-expert-testifi [Accessed: 23 August 2024] and here: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/mexican-congress-hears-extraterrestrials-may-exist-192934981929 [Accessed: 23 August 2024].
There is a common confusion often encountered in texts dedicated to difficult issues: the distinction between ‘supernatural’ and ‘preternatural.’ What is the difference? ‘Supernatural’ refers to any manifestation of God’s power (for example, God’s parting of the waters of the red sea when Moses lifted up his staff—Exodus chapters 13 and 14). ‘Preternatural,’ on the other hand, refers to any manifestation of a non-embodied spiritual being (i.e., an angel or demon but not God) who can influence our physical world in a ‘paranormal’ (i.e., beyond normal) manner. For instance, an angel can make a physical object instantly invisible to us.
Lewis wasn't wrong!
He only said that if there were other races elsewhere, they would not be fallen, and its a measure of OUR fallenness that we can only imagine them as evil.
He wrote novels about creatures on other planets because he was exploring the idea of what an unfallen race would be like, and indeed it is very hard for us to imagine this! He believed in the depths of sin and wanted to show that we would be a danger to an unfallen race, not the other way around -- in order to confront us, imaginatively, with the depravity we often just deprecate as uninteresting or unimportant. We are *comfortable* in our sinfulness.
He wanted to display the *differences* in creatures apart from their *sinfulness* -- the idea that God creates a diversity of beings and the diversity is not dependent on sin. In other words, in our sanctified natures we would not be all the same and we would delight in that splendor. The differences radiate His glory.
In fiction, creative writers imagine all sorts of things. That doesn't mean they think those things really exist. Tolkien didn't think there were elves and dwarves either...
Greetings Mr. Kmita,
I appreciate your output very much, and consider it a valuable source of information regarding traditional Catholicism and classical metaphysics. Since one of my hobbies is translating interesting texts to Polish, I have translated a number of your articles. If you're interested in these translations, please feel free to contact me. My email address is pawel.lugiewicz@proton.me.
Best wishes,
Paweł Ługiewicz